Heather burning: Antis told to back off

A new study accepted for publication in the Royal Society’s journal says most of the points antis use to attack heather burning cannot be backed by evidence – and it calls for antis and journalists to lay off the “unhelpful propaganda” surrounding the subject.

The paper, set to be published later this year in the prestigious peer-reviewed journal, thoroughly assessed the available scientific literature and concluded that many commonly held views are not verified by the evidence currently available.

These include the preconceptions that: regular burning increases heather dominance; fire kills or significantly damages Sphagnum moss; peatlands are particularly sensitive sites with regard to fire; the interaction between wildfires and managed burning is clear; and fire alone can contribute to peatland degradation.

The paper went on to criticise journalists who relied on press releases from campaigning organisations to produce sensational stories on the subject, without reading the original paper or consulting an independent expert. It identified three press releases issued by the RSPB in 2015, all picked up by the press, which bore “only a passing resemblance to the key findings.”

The GWCT’s Andrew Gilruth said: “A recent study of heather burning in the Peak District concluded that, where they looked, it is being done well. It does conform to best practice guidelines: the overall area burned is small; individual fires are of an appropriate size; and the risk of escape to wildfire is low.”

He said it was time for the public to “accept that fire is a vital part of moorland management and we should focus on learning how to do it well.”

Tagged with: , , , ,
Posted in Features, News
One comment on “Heather burning: Antis told to back off
  1. David Mitchell says:

    When you speak of the need for heather burning you should realise that you are also burning everything else that might be there. Plants , insects, lizards , snakes and goodness knows what else. And why burn anyway ? The heather has been here for millennia and did not need man,s intervention. You need to come clean and accept it is done purely for your precious grouse and for no other reason.The public are not fooled by this nor any scientific paper that supposedly supports your position. It would be equally easy to produce a scientific paper stating the damage caused by your antics. You can call us antis if you like, I will not share with you what we call you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Follow Us!

Newsletter Sign Up
Please take a few moments to register for our free e-mail newsletter to get all the latest news and views on the shooting world delivered straight to your inbox